I think I could probably be a case study in a book called Metadata For The Terrified. Or Metadata For Dummies.
Over the last week or two I’ve been coming to terms with how the DSpace metadata works and relates to the input submissions form – the metadata is pretty good, I like how DSpace lets you add fields using a web form, but the submissions page is pretty dismal, IMHO. Using an idea from Mahendra in UKOLN, I’ve written out a spreadsheet listing which fields are needed for which item and come to the resounding conclusion that we need to customise the submission form to deposit by item type. A big ask, apparently, although some good examples out there, such as Hasselt University, who presented on submission based on document type at the DSpace User Group meeting in Rome in October.
Yes, I know, ePrints does this nicely. Point taken.
Metadata For The Terrified
October 28, 2007 by Kara
Posted in dspace, institutional repository, metadata | No Comments Yet
Leave a Reply
my:self-archive
Reflections on institutional repositories, self-archiving, open access and libraries.a
RSS Feed
Archives
Category Cloud
announcements branding dspace Eprints events institutional repository libraries licence metadata open access publishers Repository Support Project Research Excellence Framework search self-archiving social software software technology training UKCoRR UKOLN Uncategorized University of Bath University of Bath OPuS-
Blog Stats
- 14,395 hits
